United States v Arnold, Schwinn & Co. :: 388 U.S. 365 1967 :: Justia US Supreme Court Center

At trial, the United States asserted that not only the price-fixing, but also Schwinn’s methods of distribution were illegal per se under § 1 of the Sherman Act. The evidence, largely offered by appellees, elaborately sets forth information as to the total market interaction and interbrand competition, as well as the distribution program and practices.… Continue reading United States v Arnold, Schwinn & Co. :: 388 U.S. 365 1967 :: Justia US Supreme Court Center

United States v Arnold, Schwinn & Co. :: 388 U.S. 365 1967 :: Justia US Supreme Court Center

But in terms of U.S. employment, “it’s really a shadow of what it used to be.” From California, the bikes fan out to mass merchants such as Wal-Mart. Once there, cashiers making less than $10 an hour ring up the latest Sting Ray at prices much cheaper than the original. Pacific sells more than a… Continue reading United States v Arnold, Schwinn & Co. :: 388 U.S. 365 1967 :: Justia US Supreme Court Center

United States v Arnold, Schwinn & Co. :: 388 U.S. 365 1967 :: Justia US Supreme Court Center

By 1979, even the Paramount had been passed, technologically speaking, by a new generation of American as well as foreign custom bicycle manufacturers. A growing number of US teens and young adults were purchasing imported European sport racing or sport touring bicycles, many fitted with multiple derailleur-shifted gears. Schwinn decided to meet the challenge by… Continue reading United States v Arnold, Schwinn & Co. :: 388 U.S. 365 1967 :: Justia US Supreme Court Center

Hearings United States Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services

All pressure washer wands have a way to prevent accidental engagement of the trigger. Some models require a manual process; others are done automatically. The latter can add an extra level of safety but can be less convenient to use. Indicates whether the pressure washer has the preferred hose reel, a way to manually wrap… Continue reading Hearings United States Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services

United States v Arnold, Schwinn & Co. :: 388 U.S. 365 1967 :: Justia US Supreme Court Center

In Taiwan, Schwinn was able to conclude a new production agreement with Giant Bicycles, transferring Schwinn’s frame design and manufacturing expertise to Giant in the process. With this partnership, Schwinn increased their bicycle sales to 500,000 per year by 1985. Schwinn’s annual sales soon neared the million mark, and the company turned a profit in… Continue reading United States v Arnold, Schwinn & Co. :: 388 U.S. 365 1967 :: Justia US Supreme Court Center

United States v Arnold, Schwinn & Co. :: 388 U.S. 365 1967 :: Justia US Supreme Court Center

Dorel intends to announce specific details regarding the use of the net proceeds from the sale at the time of closing. Martin Schwartz, Dorel’s President and CEO, made the following observations about the sale of its bicycle division. Schwinn’s Chicago handbuild shop was closed in 1979 and production of the Paramount came to a halt… Continue reading United States v Arnold, Schwinn & Co. :: 388 U.S. 365 1967 :: Justia US Supreme Court Center

United States v Arnold, Schwinn & Co. :: 388 U.S. 365 1967 :: Justia US Supreme Court Center

W. Schwinn, grandson Frank Valentine Schwinn took over management of the company. The company also joined with other United States bicycle manufacturers in a campaign to raise import tariffs across the board on all imported bicycles. In August 1955, the Eisenhower administration implemented a 22.5% tariff rate for three out of four categories of bicycles.… Continue reading United States v Arnold, Schwinn & Co. :: 388 U.S. 365 1967 :: Justia US Supreme Court Center

Official Gazette of the United States Patent and Trademark Office: Patents United States Patent and Trademark Office

We tested each fan’s performance through a battery of tests that cover four metrics. We put together a complete picture of each model through laboratory tests, precision alen breathesmart measurements, everyday usage, and qualitative analyses. Here we break down the metrics we evaluated and the tests we used to pinpoint the best ones for specific… Continue reading Official Gazette of the United States Patent and Trademark Office: Patents United States Patent and Trademark Office

Official Gazette of the United States Patent and Trademark Office: Patents United States Patent and Trademark Office

If you’re here hunting for a pedestal fan that works and won’t blow your budget, the Comfort Zone 3-Speed is that fan. It’s extremely simple and straightforward in operation and does precisely what you’d expect from a basic fan. Its top-measured speed hit just above average at 10.9 mph on High. Unfortunately, this heavy gizmo… Continue reading Official Gazette of the United States Patent and Trademark Office: Patents United States Patent and Trademark Office

Hearings United States Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services

Our product experts start by analyzing the current marketplace to identify the pressure washer you’re most likely to find on store shelves and online. From there, we focus on the brands that have performed the best and proven the most reliable through years of pressure washer tests at the Good Housekeeping Institute. The This Old… Continue reading Hearings United States Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services